Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
https://steamhost.cn/curator/40640212/
The reason I bring this up among many others I've found recently is that curators like this have members trading away curator copies without even having reviewed the games that they were given curator copies for. At a certain point it's kind of ridiculous that this kind of stuff is being allowed to continue. Sure it's not THAT big of a deal, but this obviously isn't what the developers of the games give access through curator groups to people for. They don't intend for these people to in turn not even play or activate a curator copy on their own account but trade it away to benefit themselves without giving the game any attention. Sure a curator group isn't obligated to review a game positively or negatively if they are given a copy of the game, but not even claiming the game for themselves and giving it to someone else for their own gain is a bit much.