安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
https://steamhost.cn/curator/40640212/
The reason I bring this up among many others I've found recently is that curators like this have members trading away curator copies without even having reviewed the games that they were given curator copies for. At a certain point it's kind of ridiculous that this kind of stuff is being allowed to continue. Sure it's not THAT big of a deal, but this obviously isn't what the developers of the games give access through curator groups to people for. They don't intend for these people to in turn not even play or activate a curator copy on their own account but trade it away to benefit themselves without giving the game any attention. Sure a curator group isn't obligated to review a game positively or negatively if they are given a copy of the game, but not even claiming the game for themselves and giving it to someone else for their own gain is a bit much.