安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
https://steamhost.cn/curator/40640212/
The reason I bring this up among many others I've found recently is that curators like this have members trading away curator copies without even having reviewed the games that they were given curator copies for. At a certain point it's kind of ridiculous that this kind of stuff is being allowed to continue. Sure it's not THAT big of a deal, but this obviously isn't what the developers of the games give access through curator groups to people for. They don't intend for these people to in turn not even play or activate a curator copy on their own account but trade it away to benefit themselves without giving the game any attention. Sure a curator group isn't obligated to review a game positively or negatively if they are given a copy of the game, but not even claiming the game for themselves and giving it to someone else for their own gain is a bit much.