Recent reviews by ub3r

Whoever designed this no time limit lobbies should reconsider himself as a gamedesigner.

Best game on UE4 so far. Overall great performance, fair price, good looking graphics, nice sounds, gore, decent netcode, customization and many many more. If you're an old medieval fan this game deserves your attention.
BUT
if you're not a medieval fan better don't even look on it.
Melee combat system is the most frustrating and inconvenient thing I personally EVER met in video games and what makes everything even worse - if you're not a fan of such setting - you'll not have motivation to master this game.

First of all - i've 6700k, 32gigs of ram and 1070. When i've bought all that stuff I've never thought that any RTS will ever lag on it, unfortunately Imperator: Rome does. I have no huge lags in general, but lagspikes while zooming in/zooming out.
The game is a mix between EU4 and CK2. Combat system seems simple (after HoI IV) and similar to EU4. The whole game seems similar to EU4, tbh. If you've a spare buck - give this game a try. If you're looking for something new in genre, well made and polished - stay away from this game for at least half of the year (or may be even year). Additional note for ppl who're seeking for decent multiplayer - this game isn't this case (may be at least for now, who knows).
TL;DR Paradox being Paradox.

If you prefer WW2 setting over fantasy - give this game a try.
Overall game is way more simple than MtG, therefore more random.
Cards have nice art tho.
No drafts, no sideboards, no BO3, no mobile versions atm.

This game is a typical example of niche games (such as flight sims). It will never be mainstream kinda game and will never have great online, but if you like game's setting it definitely worth to try.

+ Authentic and historically accurate
+ Great core community
+ 75 vs 75 players
+ Decent FPS (this game isn't about KDA, so having 30-60 on ultra somewhere in the middle of fight with gun shooting, smoke in the air, a lot of players nearby is ok.)
+ Decent netcode
+ Game forces you to play as a part of formation (Line, Skirmishing) instead of going rambo
+ Decent overall quality for a game by indie company in alpha
+ In-game clan system
+ Dynamic weather
+ A lot of triggered snowflakes in Steam's reviews section

- You'll never see your KDA or any other score. (That's a controversial feature, but for newcomers it has more negative tone, than positive)
- Gameplay and your game experience could and will be different depending on your NCOs and Officers. (It's not a game's problem actually, but still affects gameplay tho)
- Game could be boring in general. Again it depends on NCOs, Officers, your company and other ppl-related things. Game is positioning itself like a milsim, so keep this in mind.

CoH > CoH 2

Whoever designed this "return to the combat area this is an enemy controlled territory" feature should prolly die or at least stop working as a game designer.
#NotHateSpech

Эта игра как чайный пакетик: она вроде как и неплохая, и в целом выручает когда тебе хочется поиграть в шутан, но нет времени на что-то более серьезное, однако при этом ты прекрасно понимаешь что это не то, во что ты хотел бы играть несколько недель подряд.

Фпс хороший, неткод попрет, ганплей приятный, но в целом игра скучная ♥♥♥♥♥♥, т.к. не выделяется абсолютно ничем.

Да. работает лучше чем в 2018.

(Review text hidden)

YOU WERE THE CHOSEN ONE! IT WAS SAID THAT YOU WOULD BE A NICE GAME ABOUT WW2, NOT ANOTHER GARBAGE ON UE4!
Developers of this game are just another bunch of useless smoothie-drinkers.
You can't just take a game engine and make a game if you don't want to refactor your own code.
Ok, screw it, but even some no-code related things such as map design or game design were a way more better on Beta than now.