Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
See discussion at https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/workshop/filedetails/discussion/3392675400/600782278340184664/
And I agree that full muscle should be more beneficial to carry weight! I'm actually looking into buffing them for higher muscle, while still making it not too punishing for skinny pawns. I'll try to come up with a formula that's easy on the performance that achieve this effect.
Which would affect pawn benefit from Muscles for Pick Up and Haul or Combat Extended.
If those two are not the same, then I withdraw my objection :D if anything full muscle could boost CarryWeight even more :P
The issue with making Carrying Capacity depend on Muscle/Fat is that it usually doesn’t have a positive effect. Even with a +20% buff, they still carry 75 wood because that’s the stack limit. It only really helps if the pawn has a debuff (like low Manipulation), but most of the time it just limits carrying.
I wasn’t able to find any situation where the system was actually beneficial. If you have a reason to keep this feature, could you share your experience? I’m mainly removing it to avoid unnecessarily nerfing pawns, not to prevent buffs. If there’s a real advantage to keeping it, I’ll consider adding it back.