Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It cheats by shifting almost all production to aircraft when it needs them (normally, this wouldn't be possible, because it would never be possible to build such a large amount of air assembly, and, for example, British AI was already using more air assembly points by 1941 than it could have obtained by the end of the war).
Perhaps this problem could be solved by removing the ability to build assembly plants and instead increasing their growth through industry development and, additionally, through a national focus tree (as is already the case, but to a small extent) to significantly differentiate capabilities among major countries?
This way, production limits could be naturally introduced for specific time periods.
It would also be possible to eliminate some of the simulation of IC involvement in assembly production by arranging them in concentric_circle (costing 999999 IC).
But dont worry AI being to strong by cheating, they will follow the historical path deploying army.
Thanks to such a large bonus, the AI can set all available factories to produce important equipment (e.g. set up 120 factories to produce fighters or even the heaviest bombers at once).