Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
I'm unsure how Trotsky or Bukharin are supposed to takeover. Trotsky needs to be "invited" and Bukharin needs to be chosen as the next "General-Secretary" or leader. When it came time to choose which path to take, Tukhachevsky as a dictator was the only option for the event so there's something I'm missing.
I'll find out more in a bit.
If you keep the NKVD and the Military as is (choose the +50 pp options for both) you get Tukhachevsky as dictator.
If you kill the NKVD and keep the Military intact, you get Bukharin.
If you keep the NKVD intact and kill the Military, you get Trotsky.
And if you kill the NKVD and kill the Military, you get Bukharin anyway.
Probably better to keep the Military with Bukharin instead of killing both for the sake of it.