Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
I'm unsure how Trotsky or Bukharin are supposed to takeover. Trotsky needs to be "invited" and Bukharin needs to be chosen as the next "General-Secretary" or leader. When it came time to choose which path to take, Tukhachevsky as a dictator was the only option for the event so there's something I'm missing.
I'll find out more in a bit.
If you keep the NKVD and the Military as is (choose the +50 pp options for both) you get Tukhachevsky as dictator.
If you kill the NKVD and keep the Military intact, you get Bukharin.
If you keep the NKVD intact and kill the Military, you get Trotsky.
And if you kill the NKVD and kill the Military, you get Bukharin anyway.
Probably better to keep the Military with Bukharin instead of killing both for the sake of it.