安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I'm unsure how Trotsky or Bukharin are supposed to takeover. Trotsky needs to be "invited" and Bukharin needs to be chosen as the next "General-Secretary" or leader. When it came time to choose which path to take, Tukhachevsky as a dictator was the only option for the event so there's something I'm missing.
I'll find out more in a bit.
If you keep the NKVD and the Military as is (choose the +50 pp options for both) you get Tukhachevsky as dictator.
If you kill the NKVD and keep the Military intact, you get Bukharin.
If you keep the NKVD intact and kill the Military, you get Trotsky.
And if you kill the NKVD and kill the Military, you get Bukharin anyway.
Probably better to keep the Military with Bukharin instead of killing both for the sake of it.