Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/evaluating-gold-from-buildings.1423285/
Does your mod do anything in that regard? I see that you increased development growth rate on the buildings. But is it enough?
That'd be a yes, and a "I would like to believe so, yes". Development is way more significant a factor in the mod than in vanilla, where it is up to a pitful +50% tax at 100 development, which you would most likely not reach anyway.
Here, it is up to +200%. So economic buildings will, and absolutely do pay off, long-term. Its more of a project to commit to, however, since their returns are exponential - the more you build up the economy of one county (development is county-wide, not holding-wide), the higher the returns.
In other words, you want to have economical centres, rather than drop one economic building there, one there, and hope it turns out okay. It still will most likely be worth it, even in that case, but will not pay off nearly as quickly.