Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/evaluating-gold-from-buildings.1423285/
Does your mod do anything in that regard? I see that you increased development growth rate on the buildings. But is it enough?
That'd be a yes, and a "I would like to believe so, yes". Development is way more significant a factor in the mod than in vanilla, where it is up to a pitful +50% tax at 100 development, which you would most likely not reach anyway.
Here, it is up to +200%. So economic buildings will, and absolutely do pay off, long-term. Its more of a project to commit to, however, since their returns are exponential - the more you build up the economy of one county (development is county-wide, not holding-wide), the higher the returns.
In other words, you want to have economical centres, rather than drop one economic building there, one there, and hope it turns out okay. It still will most likely be worth it, even in that case, but will not pay off nearly as quickly.