Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Rangers, for example, could do more damage to animals or Rouges gained more debuffs to apply to enemies.
As for a hero to prototype, the Wizard seems like a good pick for option variety with all the different types of spells.
The eventual plan is for heroes to be just as in-depth, perhaps even more so than in a typical RPG, with an equipment system, a Magic Find property to base the quality of drops, heroes able to sell/pawn useless items to shops, or even just give them to another hero that could use them based on how much the one hero likes the other. Right now, I'n slowly working my way through my experimental projects list, and with the Mana System having been implemented from the list successfully, its looking hopeful that I can see the other ones realized on there as well.
As for a hero to prototype, why not the Warrior?
I feel like I'm getting mixed singals here.
Not sure why I typed Warrior.