Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고








Rangers, for example, could do more damage to animals or Rouges gained more debuffs to apply to enemies.
As for a hero to prototype, the Wizard seems like a good pick for option variety with all the different types of spells.
The eventual plan is for heroes to be just as in-depth, perhaps even more so than in a typical RPG, with an equipment system, a Magic Find property to base the quality of drops, heroes able to sell/pawn useless items to shops, or even just give them to another hero that could use them based on how much the one hero likes the other. Right now, I'n slowly working my way through my experimental projects list, and with the Mana System having been implemented from the list successfully, its looking hopeful that I can see the other ones realized on there as well.
As for a hero to prototype, why not the Warrior?
I feel like I'm getting mixed singals here.
Not sure why I typed Warrior.