安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Rangers, for example, could do more damage to animals or Rouges gained more debuffs to apply to enemies.
As for a hero to prototype, the Wizard seems like a good pick for option variety with all the different types of spells.
The eventual plan is for heroes to be just as in-depth, perhaps even more so than in a typical RPG, with an equipment system, a Magic Find property to base the quality of drops, heroes able to sell/pawn useless items to shops, or even just give them to another hero that could use them based on how much the one hero likes the other. Right now, I'n slowly working my way through my experimental projects list, and with the Mana System having been implemented from the list successfully, its looking hopeful that I can see the other ones realized on there as well.
As for a hero to prototype, why not the Warrior?
I feel like I'm getting mixed singals here.
Not sure why I typed Warrior.