International Peace Coalition (IPC)
Overview
The International Peace Coalition (IPC) was founded in 1947 after the Second Great War (1939–1945), with the aim of preventing future conflicts, providing humanitarian aid, and fostering global cooperation. The organization, which began with high hopes, has become plagued by inefficiency, corruption, and internal political strife, often failing to meet its ambitious goals. Its reputation has been further damaged by its rivalry with the growing Merlins organization, which has emerged as a more effective alternative.

1. History of the IPC
Formation and Early Years
The IPC was founded by the Eagle Federation, Kestrel SSR, Cormorant Commonwealth, and Raven Union after the war. The organization’s mission was to rebuild nations devastated by the conflict, implement global diplomacy, and provide humanitarian aid. However, the early years saw rising tensions between the Eagle Federation and Kestrel SSR over influence and military interventions. These tensions quickly turned the IPC into a battleground for ideological and political struggles, undermining its unity.

Cold War Tensions
As the world recovered from the war, the IPC's diplomatic role became increasingly limited. The growing rivalry between the Eagle Federation and Kestrel SSR led to an ineffective response to global crises. The Raven Union's declining power further weakened the IPC’s decision-making process, and its inability to act decisively in situations like the Tylonian Conflict led to growing skepticism about its ability to maintain global peace.

The Rise of Merlins
By the 2020s, the emergence of Merlins, a rival organization focused on direct humanitarian intervention and effective conflict resolution, presented a serious challenge to the IPC's credibility. Merlins successfully intervened in conflict zones like Greenstone Valley and Copper Ridge, where the IPC had failed to act. This success sparked widespread dissatisfaction with the IPC's methods, leading many to call for reform or a complete replacement of the organization.

2. Structure of the IPC
Executive Council
The IPC is governed by the Executive Council, which consists of representatives from the most powerful member states. The 7 Permanent Members hold veto power:

Eagle Federation
Raven Union
Hawk Empire
Cormorant Commonwealth
Democratic People Republic of Albatross
Kestrel SSR
Cassowary Triumvirate
These nations control the organization's major decisions. Smaller members often feel sidelined, as the decisions of the Permanent Members dominate the direction of the IPC.

General Assembly
The General Assembly includes representatives from all IPC member states. Although it is meant to be a platform for discussion, it lacks real power. Resolutions passed here are non-binding and are often ignored by the Permanent Members.

Specialized Agencies
The IPC has several specialized divisions:

Humanitarian Aid Division: Handles global relief efforts but is often hampered by corruption and logistical inefficiencies.
Peacekeeping Force: Deployed in conflict zones, but frequently criticized for being underfunded and politically constrained.
Environmental Task Force: Aims to address global ecological crises but struggles against the interests of industrialized nations within the IPC.

3. Membership of the IPC
The IPC has 41 member states, including major global powers and smaller nations:

Silvereye City-State (Israel-like)
Pigeon Federation (Latin America)
Federal Republic of Heron (West Germany-like)
Kingfisher Democratic Republic (Ukraine-like)
Republic of Sparrow (neutral Nordic countries)
Democratic People Republic of Albatross (France-like)
Despite the large number of members, power within the IPC is largely concentrated in the hands of the Permanent Members. Smaller countries have little influence over the decisions made by the larger powers.

4. Objectives of the IPC
The IPC's goals are outlined in its Charter of Global Unity:

Peace Preservation: Preventing global conflict through diplomacy and peacekeeping interventions, though often ineffective due to political infighting.
Humanitarian Assistance: Providing aid to nations affected by conflict and disaster, although often marred by inefficiency and corruption.
Environmental Protection: Addressing climate change and other global ecological threats, but limited by opposition from member states with industrial interests.
Development and Reconstruction: Rebuilding nations affected by war, though initiatives are often underfunded and slow-moving.

5. Criticism of the IPC
The IPC faces significant criticism from both its own members and the international community:

Corruption and Inefficiency: The IPC is plagued by bureaucratic red tape, corruption, and slow decision-making, making it unable to effectively intervene in crises.
Failure to Prevent Conflicts: The IPC has failed to act decisively in critical conflicts, such as the Tylonian Rebellion and the Vahari Genocide, leaving power vacuums that lead to prolonged suffering.
Geopolitical Influence: The IPC is often seen as serving the interests of its most powerful members, particularly the Eagle Federation and Kestrel SSR, leaving smaller nations with little influence.
Merlins' Effectiveness: The rise of the Merlins as a more agile and transparent peacekeeping force has highlighted the IPC's inadequacies, further eroding trust in the organization.

Conclusion
The International Peace Coalition was created with noble goals, but its internal struggles, inefficiency, and corruption have left it struggling to meet its objectives. While it remains a powerful institution in global diplomacy, it faces mounting challenges, especially from the Merlins, which are more responsive and effective in their operations. The future of the IPC hinges on its ability to reform, overcome its internal divisions, and adapt to a rapidly changing global landscape.