Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Also, there's a low number of brush-based architecture, instead a lot of props have been used. This means the level will be less optimized (unless you make func-occluders inside some crates, which isn't recommended).
I also think you could achieve better detail with less props by using displacement cliffs/etc. Instead of a ton of trees.
Yes, it's flat by design. It's a recreation of a similar map from Call of Duty. As for the props and optimization - I honestly don't think that any modern and even not-so-modern systems will be affected by the number of props, since the map is really small and there are not *that* many props, unlike on some other maps. I'll refine the background detailing, though.
That will be fixed.
This is not a map issue, please do not derail threads. You 'download' maps by subscribing to them.