Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Also, there's a low number of brush-based architecture, instead a lot of props have been used. This means the level will be less optimized (unless you make func-occluders inside some crates, which isn't recommended).
I also think you could achieve better detail with less props by using displacement cliffs/etc. Instead of a ton of trees.
Yes, it's flat by design. It's a recreation of a similar map from Call of Duty. As for the props and optimization - I honestly don't think that any modern and even not-so-modern systems will be affected by the number of props, since the map is really small and there are not *that* many props, unlike on some other maps. I'll refine the background detailing, though.
That will be fixed.
This is not a map issue, please do not derail threads. You 'download' maps by subscribing to them.