Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Also, there's a low number of brush-based architecture, instead a lot of props have been used. This means the level will be less optimized (unless you make func-occluders inside some crates, which isn't recommended).
I also think you could achieve better detail with less props by using displacement cliffs/etc. Instead of a ton of trees.
Yes, it's flat by design. It's a recreation of a similar map from Call of Duty. As for the props and optimization - I honestly don't think that any modern and even not-so-modern systems will be affected by the number of props, since the map is really small and there are not *that* many props, unlike on some other maps. I'll refine the background detailing, though.
That will be fixed.
This is not a map issue, please do not derail threads. You 'download' maps by subscribing to them.