Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Also, there's a low number of brush-based architecture, instead a lot of props have been used. This means the level will be less optimized (unless you make func-occluders inside some crates, which isn't recommended).
I also think you could achieve better detail with less props by using displacement cliffs/etc. Instead of a ton of trees.
Yes, it's flat by design. It's a recreation of a similar map from Call of Duty. As for the props and optimization - I honestly don't think that any modern and even not-so-modern systems will be affected by the number of props, since the map is really small and there are not *that* many props, unlike on some other maps. I'll refine the background detailing, though.
That will be fixed.
This is not a map issue, please do not derail threads. You 'download' maps by subscribing to them.