安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Also, there's a low number of brush-based architecture, instead a lot of props have been used. This means the level will be less optimized (unless you make func-occluders inside some crates, which isn't recommended).
I also think you could achieve better detail with less props by using displacement cliffs/etc. Instead of a ton of trees.
Yes, it's flat by design. It's a recreation of a similar map from Call of Duty. As for the props and optimization - I honestly don't think that any modern and even not-so-modern systems will be affected by the number of props, since the map is really small and there are not *that* many props, unlike on some other maps. I'll refine the background detailing, though.
That will be fixed.
This is not a map issue, please do not derail threads. You 'download' maps by subscribing to them.